The Broadband Forum has published a new standard that may help to tackle the issue of vendor lock-in on Fibre-to-the-Premises (FTTP) broadband ISP networks, which can result in the management cycle of optical modems (ONU / ONTs) being tied to a specific vendor’s Optical Line Terminal (OLT).

Just to translate this. When you get a FTTP service installed in your home, an engineer will generally fit an Optical Network Terminal (ONT / ONU) on to your wall, which is simply a device (pictured) that works to convert the optical fibre signal into a more conventional electrical one (i.e. an optical modem) that your broadband router can understand (i.e. your router connects to the ONT via a regular old copper Ethernet LAN cable).

Meanwhile, the ONT itself connects back, via optical fibre and some other bits (splitters etc.), to an Optical Line Terminal (OLT) deeper in the network (often at an exchange / headend), which itself then connects into the operator’s core network and helps to manage the end-user connections as part of the wider Passive Optical Network (PON).

However, operator’s often like to ensure that their OLT and ONT kit comes from the same vendor, which enables them to share all the necessary features, have no compatibility problems and also makes it generally easier on the support side. But times are changing and, in particular, the move toward software defined fibre access networks makes de-coupling aspects of the ONT and OLT link more viable, which can reduce the operator’s costs and make future upgrades easier and quicker to deploy.

The latest example of this hails from the Broadband Forum’s new TR-451 (vOMCI Specification) and MR-451 (ONU Management using Virtualized OMCI) standards. The latest specification enables operators to “de-couple the ONU and OLT from control and management purposes, with the Virtualized ONU Management (vOMCI) being introduced as a solution to centralize operations without relying on each OLT to act as a management entity.”

As a result, the operators’ OLT vendors no longer need to be intimately involved in the roll-out of the management services and features provided by the ONU. TR-451 also increases the number of potential ONU vendors, allowing operators to better negotiate the best prices for ONUs. The specification enables easier interoperability testing and on-boarding of ONUs within an operator’s ecosystem and cloud-based network.

Bruno Cornaglia, Co-Director of the SDN/NFV Work Area at Broadband Forum, said:

“The latest specification can be used in the evolution of the management of ONUs, not as a replacement for the management processes and data models already in use by operators but to future-proof their infrastructure while maintaining their investment in existing ONU devices.

Ultimately, ONU management will be more adaptive to changes in operators’ processes and services, as well as less costly to maintain.”

Just to be clear, this moves the OMCI functionality used to manage an ONU – traditionally embedded within the OLT network elements – and shift it into the Operator’s network. Operators that adopt the new approach for future deployments may thus enjoy greater flexibility in how they create, activate, and maintain services associated with ONUs.

Mark… Just a heads up… Typo 3 line from the end 😉

Also, do you mean ‘modem’ here: “i.e. an optical model” (end of para 2)

Interesting article – I’m interested to know how many of the operators are going to implement it in their networks?

Many* – having the ability to use a choice of ONT and then managing them centrally provides the operator with a massive advantage when it comes to hardware selection as they are no longer tied to a single vendor. So if the OLT they really like had terrible ONTs they can now decouple that and buy the best from different suppliers.

*This requires changes to the way an operator manages their hardware estate, as such it will depend on their current solution and the ease of change for that organisation, expect to see it in the next range of hardware platform that they deploy (after the vendors make it available).

I am confused, which is not difficult, to be honest :). So service providers change the ONT when a customer change to them? So if i was with say BT FTTP and then went with Sky FTTP, since they both use the open reach FTTP network, would sky put a new ONT in? I don’t havr FTTP at all, but it seems like Open reach and Zzoomm is now up here. Get none and then all at once gets two, just like buses.

No, that isn’t the case. If you’re using one Openreach FTTP service (BT in your example), and then switched to say Sky (also uses Openreach FTTP), the ONT is still the Openreach one and nothing changes. The Router that connects to the ONT would change as BT and Sky provide different ones.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.