The Ministry of Public Function (SFP) must make public the firm resolutions in which public servants have been sanctioned for the crime of corruption, mainly for the presentation of apocryphal documents to obtain an economic benefit.This was ordered by the National Institute of Transparency, Access to Information and Protection of Personal Data (Inai), after resolving the challenge of an individual who was denied that data.“It is highly relevant to know the resolutions in which public servants have been sanctioned for the presentation of documentation that is apocryphal or false to obtain an economic benefit, since the illicit in question is, generally, accompanied by acts of corruption, and (...) in the fight against corruption, transparency and the participation of society through surveillance, but also through scrutiny and the actions and decisions of public servants in all the governmental spheres”, referred the commissioner Adrián Alcalá Méndez when presenting the case before the plenary session.He explained that the heads of the internal control bodies, as well as those of the responsibility units and their delegates in the State productive companies must inform the General Coordinator of Surveillance and Control Bodies of the investigations under their charge of this type that are relevant, considering elements such as the quality or level of the public servant involved in the facts to be investigated, which must be equal to or greater than that of the general director or equivalent in State entities.Other factors to consider the cases relevant are that the amount of the resources involved in the facts, object of the investigation or the audit, exceeds 10 million pesos;that has political-social impact and that has gained importance in the media.The matters submitted to the consideration of the General Coordination of the Surveillance and Control Bodies must comply with the identification of the matter, an assigned file, knowing the administrative unit responsible for the attention of the matter, in addition to the facts that motivated the action of the administrative unit. responsible and a proposal regarding the authority that, where appropriate, should investigate or substantiate the corresponding procedure, detailed the commissioner.In the case presented, an individual who requested information on the resolutions in which public servants have been sanctioned for presenting apocryphal documentation to obtain an economic benefit.End your day well informed with the most relevant notes with this newsletterCopyright © All rights reserved |EL UNIVERSAL, National Journalistic Company.In the absence of prior authorization, the publication, retransmission, editing and any other use of the contents is expressly prohibited.